W hy didn’t the FBI take control of the crime scene in September 2015?Īt the very least, the FBI should should have gotten a copy of the server logs. The server logs would certainly supply important clues that could eventually be traced back to the alleged hackers. The hacked server is supposed to be examined. The FBI is required to lock down the crime scene and take position of any and all evidence in order to launch an investigation. Yet all they did was call the DNC? This is not what is supposed to happen when a major crime is committed. The FBI had evidence that a major crime had been committed with Russians hacking DNC server in Washington DC. There is a fundamental problem with the first DNC attack. Our Comments on the September 15 Cozy Bear DNC Attack As noted before, t he F Secure Report ignored a mountain of information such as server call back locations indicating that the Dukes were not Russians but Americans ). The NY Times article links to the F Secure Report ( we have already quoted about the Dukes which concluded the Dukes were Russian based on the Cozy Duke Time Stamps. If this were really the case, then the actions of the FBI and the DNC border on incompetence. The NY Times article claimed that the FBI knew the Dukes were Russians and had a long history opposing them.
The NY Times article states that the FBI called the DNC repeatedly but was ignored because DNC staffers thought he was an impostor rather than a real FBI agent. The incompetent mess was described in detail in a New York Times story a year later. According to this FBI agent, he personally warned the DNC that their servers were hacked by a group called the Dukes in September 2015 - but the DNC tech team took no significant action because they did not believe he was actually from the FBI. We therefore believe that the original story told by the FBI agent to the NY Times in 2016 has the most validity. We have researched all of these claims and found them to be completely false. #3: We have discovered several other attempts by the US Intelligence community to change the narrative to make it look like Cozy Bear had access as early as May 2015. But we are certain he was not telling the truth as he also made several other untrue statements and because we are certain that Crowdstrike would have cleaned him out on May 1 2016. I realize that Guccifer claimed that he had access to the DNC servers until June 2016. This can not possibly be true as Crowdstrike completely cleaned the DNC servers on and monitored them closely after that. For example, the 2017 FBI report maintains that the hackers had access until June 2016. The JanuFBI report contains many other inaccurate and obviously false statements. We do not believe that either the FBI or NSA would sit on such important information for two months. We are certain that the NSA either is Cozy Bear or was monitoring Cozy Bear servers due to past Cozy Bear attacks. Alternately, it would mean that the NSA sat on the hack for two months before telling the FBI. #1 If the hack of the DNC began in July 2015, this would mean that the FBI sat on this information for more than two months before telling the DNC. We will accept the New York Times version of events and dismiss the 2017 FBI report for several reasons: However, a report released on Januby the FBI called “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections” states on page 2 that “In July 2015, Russian Intelligence gained access to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) networks and maintained that access until at least June 2016.” The timing of the first Cozy Bear attack on the DNC was first reported in the New York Times to be September 2015 with the FBI contacting the DNC almost immediately. September 2015: Cozy Bear also known as Cozy Duke attacks DNC network. Fancy Bear is APT 28 and Cozy Bear is APT 29. APT refer s to a suspected government sponsored hacker. Reminder : APT stands for Advanced Persistent Threat.
0 kommentar(er)
